Title: PleasrDAO Files Lawsuit Against Martin Shkreli: A Comprehensive Look

In a recent turn of events, PleasrDAO, a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) known for purchasing unique non-fungible tokens (NFTs), has filed a lawsuit against Martin Shkreli, the infamous “Pharma Bro” and former hedge fund manager. This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the situation, shedding light on the circumstances leading to the lawsuit and its potential implications.


Before delving into the specifics of the lawsuit, it is essential to understand the background of both PleasrDAO and Martin Shkreli.

PleasrDAO is a collective of NFT enthusiasts and digital artists who have made headlines for purchasing high-profile NFTs, such as the one-of-a-kind Wu-Tang Clan album, “Once Upon a Time in Shaolin.” The organization is also responsible for purchasing an NFT of the Doge meme for a record-breaking $4 million.

Martin Shkreli, on the other hand, gained notoriety for drastically increasing the price of a life-saving HIV drug while serving as the CEO of Turing Pharmaceuticals. His actions led to public outcry and earned him the moniker “Pharma Bro.” Shkreli was later convicted of securities fraud and is currently serving a seven-year prison sentence.

The Lawsuit

PleasrDAO’s lawsuit against Martin Shkreli stems from a tweet Shkreli made in December 2021, in which he claimed to have “acquired the only existing physical copy” of Wu-Tang Clan’s “Once Upon a Time in Shaolin” album. Shkreli had previously purchased the album in 2015 for $2 million but was forced to forfeit it as part of his criminal sentencing.

In the tweet, Shkreli also claimed that he had “re-acquired it for a fraction of its worth,” implying that PleasrDAO, the current owners of the album’s NFT, had sold it to him.

PleasrDAO refutes Shkreli’s claims, stating that they have not sold, transferred, or interacted with the NFT in any way since its acquisition. The organization argues that Shkreli’s statements are causing confusion and damage to their reputation, and they are seeking a restraining order to prevent Shkreli from making further false claims.


The lawsuit filed by PleasrDAO against Martin Shkreli highlights the complex and evolving nature of NFTs and their ownership. As the technology is still relatively new and not fully understood by the general public, it is crucial for NFT owners to protect their assets and reputations from false claims and misinformation.

Furthermore, this situation demonstrates the potential legal hurdles NFT owners may face in the future. As the market for NFTs continues to grow, it is likely that more disputes and lawsuits will arise, making it increasingly important for NFT owners and artists to stay informed about the legal landscape surrounding these digital assets.

In Conclusion

PleasrDAO’s decision to take legal action against Martin Shkreli serves as a reminder that NFT ownership comes with responsibilities and potential risks. As the NFT market continues to mature, it is crucial for stakeholders to be proactive in protecting their assets, reputations, and the broader NFT ecosystem. By raising awareness about legal issues surrounding NFTs, artists, collectors, and enthusiasts can contribute to the long-term growth and sustainability of this exciting and innovative digital frontier.